Transparency Maldives
Multiple vacancies


Advertise your job/event/promo on Minivan News



Page added on July 12, 2012

Maldives’ defence of human rights position before UNHRC to be webcast live

Maldives’ defence of human rights position before UNHRC to be webcast live thumbnail

A Maldivian government delegation will stand before the UN Human Rights Committee (UNHRC) at 6:00pm (local time) on Thursday to discuss the current state of national efforts to address human rights and equality issues.

The committee hearing comes as certain local and international NGOs raised criticism over an alleged deterioration in commitments to address national human rights concerns since March 2011.

Representatives of the Waheed administration including Home Minister Dr Mohamed Jameel , State Minister for Foreign Affairs, Dunya Maumoon and the Maldives’ Permanent Representative in Geneva, Iruthisham Adam, will be present during today’s session to discuss human rights in the country.

A number of NGOs, including Redress, the Helios Life Association, the International Disability Alliance (IDA) and social services veteran and former State Health Minister Mariya Ali have submitted reports and evidence to the panel, which is to be webcast live.

The broadcast can be viewed live here.

The government of the Maldives responded to the list of issues to be raised during the session today earlier this month.

However, speaking to Minivan News this week, President’s Office spokesperson Abbas Adil Riza said the administration’s key focus at the UNHRC hearing was expected to be countering allegations put forward by the opposition Maldivian Democratic Party (MDP) about alleged police brutality and human rights abuses conducted since it came to power in February.

Abbas added the government would submit its case against what it called grossly “exaggerated” allegations raised by the MDP, which clams to have been removed from office in a “coup d’etat” on February 7.

UK-Maldives All Party Parliamentary Group

Aside from the reports submitted to the UNHRC, a UK-based NGO called Maldives Watch this week provided a report to the UK-Maldives All Party Parliamentary Group outlining what it claims has been a deterioration in human rights commitments despite assurances given in the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) back in March 2011.

The report claims that the perceived decline in respect of human rights practices had been largely attributed to a “rising Islamist influence and the return of the former dictatorship.”

Since February’s controversial transfer of power, President Mohamed Waheed has installed a coalition unity government consisting of former opposition groups including the Progressive Party of Maldives (PPM), the Dhivehi Rayithuge Party (DRP) and the Jumhoree Party (JP) amongst others.

The PPM is currently headed by Maumoon Abdul Gayoom, the former autocratic ruler of the Maldives, who was succeeded by former President Mohamed Nasheed in the country’s first presidential elections in 2008.

The MDP passed a resolution on February 8 contending that the present government was illegitimate.  The party has therefore refused cooperation with the coalition’s work – a position it has continued to back amidst five consecutive days of protests in Male this week that have at times descended into violent clashes with police.

While Waheed’s coalition government includes cabinet positions for several members of former President Gayoom’s family and party, the president on February 17 denied the coalition had restored an autocratic dictatorship to power.

“Anything other than President Mohamed Nasheed’s government is now being painted as the old government, as a return to the old regime. Which is a really misleading way of looking at it,” he stated at the time. “In this country most of us grew up and got education during the last 33 years, and most of the well educated people in this country worked in government. The government was the biggest employer in the country and continues to be so.”

Violation claims

To justify Maldives Watch’s claims about a deterioration of human rights in the Maldives, the report pointed to a number of developments including the adoption under the Nasheed government of Religious Unity regulations it claimed served to violate freedom of expression and right to information.

“The regulations give the Minister for Islamic Affairs arbitrary powers to ensure that only officially sanctioned views on religion can be expressed,” the report claimed.

Maldives Watch also pointed to the condemnation of UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay following calls she made back in November 2011 to encourage a national debate to ending flogging, a commitment said to have been backed by the Maldives at the UPR.

Criticisms were also made of the December 23 Coalition in Defense of Islam, which included NGOs, former opposition politicians and prominent religious figures.

“The coalition was led by radical Islamists and were joined by all opposition parties, all advocating Islamic supremacist ideas,” the report added.

Concerns were also raised over the detention of Criminal Court Chief Judge Abdullah Mohamed on January 16 2012 under the Nasheed administration .

The detention, which the the government claimed had been made over concerns about “national security” owing to allegations that Judge Abdulla was involved in perjury and “blatant collusion” with the previous administration, was widely criticised by international bodies at the time.

Other issues raised by Maldives Watch’s report include:

  • The “overthrow” On February 7 2012, of the elected Nasheed government by various members said to be linked to the December 23 Coalition
  • Claims made this year by President Waheed on February 24, May 2, and “several occasions since” from other members of government, warning against dissent and labelling opposition as terrorists
  • A “resurgence of police brutality and growing violations of freedom of assembly freedom of association, and freedom of expression” since the transfer of power
  • Calls made during a series of stalled all-party talks – last held in June – for the opposition MDP to “give up its fundamental rights relating to freedom of expression, association, and assembly”
  • Police and the military “violently” taking over the state broadcaster before former President Nasheed’s resignation on 7 February
  • Allegations that private broadcaster Raajje TV “the only TV station critical of the government” has experienced government interference in obtaining a satellite uplink and harassment of its journalists
  • Perceived bias within the country’s judiciary, which is alleged to be either controlled by the elements of the Gayoom administration “or sympathetic towards the sharia norms espoused by the government”
  • Members of the Country’s Human Rights Commission (HRCM) perceived to be sympathetic to the interests of Maumoon Abdul Gayoom with a relative said to be employed in a key position within the body

The full report submitted to the parliamentary group is available here.

FacebookTwitterEmailGoogle GmailGoogle+BeboPocketShare

9 Comments on "Maldives’ defence of human rights position before UNHRC to be webcast live"

  1. Poppat on Thu, 12th Jul 2012 8:57 PM 

    Today we saw the lies the coup regime wants to paint in front of the international community. Thankfully none of the HR Committee believed it. Bondibaiy Jameel’s lies contradicted each other so much that the members were astonished and it was a good think that they questioned Angry Bird and DMAG as to why there were so many inconsistencies…hehehe..busted in front of the whole world baghees

  2. Shahid on Fri, 13th Jul 2012 4:07 AM 

    Can not wait for the lies and bullshit from the illegal regime to try and spin their way out of this !!

  3. Magna Carta on Fri, 13th Jul 2012 5:57 AM 

    Very good article. Thank you for alerting to the UN meet. The government has been properly bashed by the UN Committee.

  4. aljaber on Fri, 13th Jul 2012 8:24 AM 

    Dear mercenary journalists. Please stop trying to bring your style of “democracy” to this country of black uneducated backward people

  5. Ismail Nazim on Fri, 13th Jul 2012 10:33 PM 

    According to UNHCR, we should have complete freedom to choose our religion.

    Can we allow this. I am all for it, but can majority of Maldivians swallow this?

  6. Wives and Concubines on Sat, 14th Jul 2012 1:04 AM 

    Interesting. I look forward to seeing the reaction from the rest of the world to the lies from the racist Jameel and his little group.

  7. Saudiyya on Sat, 14th Jul 2012 5:25 AM 

    It is true the HRCM has hired Abdullo Hameed’s son as the Secretary General, despite his qualification in music composition. According to sources, more qualified individuals with degrees in administration and management applied for the job, but the decision to select Hameed’s son was made long before the interviews were called for. It is a well-known fact that some members of the Commission including Ahmed Abdul Kareem and Ali Shameem take their orders directly from PPM and there were also rumours that Ahmed Abdul Kareem is so indebted to Yaamin and Jangiya Nazim because of the loans he’d taken to buy his car. Ali Shameem, the so-called Alysh is corrupt beyond words and is someone ready to sell his soul (if he has one) to any devil. True, the Maldives Human Rights commission is effectively hijacked by PPM and Gayoom.

  8. mode on Sat, 14th Jul 2012 10:49 AM 

    No matter what the dictator Anni and his cronies tries to bring to this country , religious freedom will never prevail in this country as long as the country exist.

    Traitor Anni can promised anything and Minivan can spread any propaganda but you will never succeed.

  9. Bondibaiy Jameel on Sat, 14th Jul 2012 4:54 PM 

    “Who gave permission to telecast this alive? especially Raajje TV?”

  • Michael Fahmy: The case is getting more and more interesting by the day.
  • Michael Fahmy: During Mohamed Nasheed’s presidency, both Gasim Ibrahim and Abdullah Yamin were also arrested. Why are these not contentious issues, and only...
  • ali: MDP will not die. You cannot kill an ideology.
  • dhivehi dhari: Ahhhh our pre-paid Sheiks, are up for another task of pitting one muslim against another. wonder who they will label as the infidel this time and get...
  • ibu: But Judge Abdullah Didi refused to go ahead in Majlis Committe with MP AliWaheed as Judge AbloDidi had a case regarding ALi Waheed… 3.25minute...
  • Phero: This guy will not give in to demands by public.He only listens to his slaves who have put him there.i.e so called police, mndf,judiciary, election commission....
  • niyasa: vanity fair nasheed!!!
  • niyasa: I am the judge and I am the jury. Hahah this is the reason why I recommended Yameen’s wife Fathimath Ibrahim to be in the jury. The international...


Torture victims in the Maldives tell their stories