Announcements



announcement

Advertise your job/event/promo on Minivan News

 

announcement


Page added on February 2, 2012

“Maldives lied”: New7wonders controversy continues in South Korea

“Maldives lied”: New7wonders controversy continues in South Korea thumbnail

A documentary regarding New7Wonders, aired on South Korean national broadcaster KBS, has drawn on the Maldives’ experience with the foundation and ignited controversy in the country regarding the nature of the competition.

Korea’s Jeju island was announced as one of the winners in the competition, along with the Amazon rainforest, Vietnam’s Halong Bay, Argentina’s Iguazu Falls, Indonesia’s Komodo, the Philippines’ Puerto Princesa underground river, and South Africa’s Table Mountain.

Votes were collected online and via paid SMS and phone voting in the various countries, in collaboration with telecom sponsors. Final vote counts for the winners were not revealed, however New7Wonders maintains that the process is “uniquely democratic”.

Following the airing of the program in South Korea, founder of the Swiss-based New7Wonders operation and self-described filmmaker, museum curator, aviator and explorer, Bernard Weber, visited the country to denounce it.

“Only a few reporters were able to attend the conference due to the short notice,” noted the Korea Herald.

“Since the announcement [about Jeju] was made, however, media outlets and activists here have been raising suspicions concerning the foundation’s identity, the money Jeju spent to be chosen and whether it was fair for government officials to take part in the voting multiple times,” the paper reported.

During the press conference, President of the Jeju Tourism Organisation Yang Young-keun revealed that Jeju residents and tourism officials spent 20 billion won (US$18 million) on international phone voting for the competition.

“With the tourism industry accounting for more than 80 percent of Jeju’s economy, 20 billion won does not seem like an unreasonably large amount of money,” Yang added.

Park Dae-seok, an official at Korea’s National Committee for Jeju New7Wonders of Nature, was also quoted as stating that “with Jeju’s 500,000 people, it would have been impossible to have the island named the New Seven Wonders and it is only fair to allow multiple voting in this sense.”

The Maldives’ cabinet announced it was withdrawing from the competition in May 2011, after claiming to have received unexpected demands for cash not explicitly specified in the original contract, in order to continue to “compete meaningfully” in the competition.

Indonesia followed suit, with the country’s tourism authorities announcing the withdrawal of Komodo from the running. In both instances, New7wonders insisted that the Maldives and Komodo remained in the competition while seeking new promoters in both countries.

Demands included ‘sponsorship fees’ (‘platinum’ at US$350,000, or two ‘gold’ at US$210,000 each) and the funding of a ‘World Tour’ event whereby the Maldives would pay for a delegation of people to visit the country, provide hot air balloon rides, press trips, flights, accommodation and communications.

In a comment piece published on Minivan News, New7wonders spokesman Eamonn Fitzgerald responded that the authority to withdraw a participant from the campaign “is a decision for New7Wonders alone, not for any government agency.”

“With the Maldives still a finalist, the critical choice to be made by the key decision-makers in the Maldives is whether to support the campaign or not,” Fitzgerald said at the time.

“I think that it would be a good idea for all the leaders in the Maldives to be active participants in the campaign for the simple reason that it makes good business sense. After all, this is why so many countries, with their public and private sectors, are enthusiastically involved in this global event.”

Voting controversy

Besides Jeju in South Korea, other winning countries responded energetically to the campaign, notably developing countries with large populations desperate to boost tourism revenue.

Vietnam’s central bank in November 2011 sent an urgent communication to the country’s financial institutions, urging them to force their employees to vote for Vietnam’s Halong Bay in the New7wonders competition.

According to the UK’s Financial Times, staff at one of Vietnam’s state-run bank were set quotas of 600 paid SMS votes each.

“Vietnamese officials, perhaps mindful of the growing importance of tourism to the economy, are going the extra mile to try to secure victory, pulling on the many control levers available to the pervasive Communist party,” the FT reported.

However some Vietnamese tourism officials cited by the FT raised concerns about the country’s expenditure on paid voting to win the competition, suggesting that the money and time “would be better spent cleaning up the worsening pollution in Halong Bay, raising safety standards on tour boats after two fatal sinkings in recent years and improving the overall environment for tourism.”

President of the Philippines, Noynoy Aquino, also urged his population to hit the phones and vote for the Puerto Princesa Underground River.

“In the Philippines we have no less than 80 million cellphone users sending nearly 2 billion text messages every day. All we need is one billion votes, so that is half a day,” Aquino said, during the river’s campaign push – a commitment of US$58 million, at PHP2.50 (US$0.058) a vote.

In the Maldives, the Swiss foundation approached telecom provider Dhiraagu seeking US$1 million in sponsorship to be its telecom partner in the Maldives, a figure that dropped by half when the company complained that the price was too high.

In a recorded interview with Korean journalists, obtained by Minivan News, Bernard Weber defends the sponsorship as “not a requirement, but a proposition.”

New7Wonders Director, Jean-Paul de la Fuente, interjects: “The Maldives people basically lied. They said if they did not bring sponsors we had threatened they would be expelled from the campaign. That’s a lie. There was no conditional sponsorship, and the proof is that five of the seven winners had no sponsors.”

Fuente continued: “The reason the Maldives person lied is because he had a personal financial interest in another business. What he did was show selected documents that clearly said there was no condition. When he resigned an alternative civic group tried to become a new committee, and he threatened them not to become a new committee.

“Unfortunately the Maldives was until recently a dictatorship, and maybe they still have some of the bad habits of a dictatorship. But we are absolutely clear that the Maldives lied,” Fuente said, and identified Managing Director of the Maldives Marketing and PR Corporation (MMPRC), Simon Hawkins, as “the main problem.”

In response, Hawkins told Minivan News today that “the only financial incentive and gain was to save the country over 500,000 US dollars for ridiculous charges from a disreputable organisation, and I succeeded. The Cabinet did their own investigation and reached their own conclusions, which was the same as ours. I also fail to see how Mr Weber can say that we were lying with the concrete evidence against him.”

Following the Maldives’ withdrawal, New7wonders approached the Maldives Association of Tourism and Travel Operators (MATATO) to take over from the MMPRC as the organising committee of the Maldives’ campaign – a move opposed by the MMPRC, as “the democratically elected Government of the Maldives is the only legitimate authority to act in the name of the Maldives and its people”.

Secretary General of MATATO, Maleeh Jamal, said at the time that the association was considering taking over the event in the government’s stead, as the studies offered by New7Wonders promised an “enormous return on investment”, and “US$500,000 for such an award would be quickly recovered. Although the money was a concern, we had a fair chance of winning,” he said at the time.

Asked today whether the MMPRC had threatened MATATO not to continue in the competition, Jamal said he did not wish to comment: “It was a huge controversy and now the whole saga is over,” he said.

Business model

The studies referred to by MATATO were also referenced by Fitzgerald in a letter to Minivan News following the cabinet decision to withdraw:

  1. Study published by Pearson of London in April 2010: US$5 billion overall in economic, tourism and brand image values for the participants and winners in the man-made New 7 Wonders of the World campaign;
  2. Study published by Grant Thornton of South Africa in April 2011: US$1.012 billion each in economic and employment value for the first five years for being successful in the New7Wonders of Nature;
  3. New study published by JDI of South Korea in May 2011: up to US$1.837 billion each per annum in economic benefits for being successful in the New7Wonders of Nature.

The New 7 Wonders of Nature was the second competition of its kind to be held by the foundation. The first, concerning man-made wonders of the world, awarded the title to Chichen Itza in Mexico, Christ the Redeemer in Brazil, Colosseum in Rome, Great Wall in China, Machu Picchu in Peru, Petra in Jordan, and the Taj Mahal in India. The Pyramids of Giza in Egypt – one of the original 7 wonders, was eventually awarded an honorary title after the Ministry of Tourism complained.

Following Indonesia’s decision to withdraw Komodo, Indonesian blogger Priyadi Nurcahyo Faith collected 15 years of tourism statistics for three of the winning attractions in the first competition, as well as national tourism arrivals, and graphed them in an attempt to correlate the effect of winning the competition.

Visitor numbers to 2007 New 7 Wonders winners. Source: Priyardi's Place

Machu Picchu recorded high growth in (overseas) visitors between 1998 and 2000 of over 20 percent a year. Visitor numbers slumped over 16 percent in 2001, returning to 40 percent in 2005. By 2006, visitors had plunged to 1.14 percent. In 2007 – the year Machu Picchu was announced a winner of the New 7 wonders competition, it had risen to 14 percent, slowing to 12 percent in 2008. In 2009 growth plunged 5 percent, worsening to 18 percent in 2010. Overall arrivals to Peru increased 41 percent in 2004, and 14 percent in the year of the competition. Arrivals dropped 4 percent in 2009.

The Taj Mahal in India showed a broadly similar trend. Foreign visitors increased dramatically 62 percent in 2005, before plunging 17 percent the following year. In 2007, visitor numbers grew 19 percent, but in 2008 the increase was less that 1 percent. Visitors dropped almost 17 percent in 2009. The increase in tourism arrivals to India as a whole continued a downward trend from 13 percent in 2005 to 7 percent in 2008.

Petra, which recorded both foreign and domestic visitors, saw a significant spike in 2007 of over 60 percent, building on a broadly positive trend from a dramatic increase of 93 percent in 2004. Visitors increased 38 percent in 2008, dropped nine percent in 2009, and increased 34 percent in 2010.

At the same time, overall visitors to Jordan dropped 3 percent in 2007, despite almost 19 percent growth the year before.

The blogger’s conclusion was that the New 7 Wonders contribution to visitor numbers was difficult to correlate amid other factors – but was likely “not so significant”.

The controversy surrounding Indonesia and the Maldives’ withdrawal from the competition, and most recently the growing attention in South Korea, has sparked interest in the foundation’s business model.

A ‘New7Wonders Foundation’ is registered in the Swiss canton of Zurich as a charitable foundation, however the New7Wonders own website describes it as “a major, global-scale proof of a business concept based on mass virtual online dynamics creating concrete economic positive outcomes in the real world”.

The Maldives Tourism Ministry initially paid a US$199 participation fee and signed a contract not with the foundation, but rather a commercial arm of the operation: New Open World Corporation (NOWC), which listed its address on the contract as a law firm in the Republic of Panama.

The fate of the money paid to NOWC by tourism authorities, sponsors and telecom partners in unclear. Funds raised, the website states, are used “to set up and run the global New7Wonders voting platform, to run the first campaign that chose the Official New 7 Wonders of the World, to run the current campaign electing the Official New7Wonders of Nature, to run the New7Wonders organisation, [and] to create a surplus for distribution.”

Swiss law does not require charitable foundations to disclose how much they pay executives, unlike the UK, and no filings, declarations of assets or record of funds distributed are available on the foundation’s website.

FacebookTwitterEmailGoogle GmailGoogle+BeboPocketShare


20 Comments on "“Maldives lied”: New7wonders controversy continues in South Korea"

  1. Ahmed Asim on Thu, 2nd Feb 2012 7:01 PM 

    No we do not want to be one of the seven wonders on the Earth.

    We would rather be the “Paradise in the after life”.
    We will get there. We will concentrate to become a Holy land on earth by rejecting anything non-islamic and prepare to go to heaven, including the beaches, the palm trees, and yellow-fin tuna.

  2. Zudha on Thu, 2nd Feb 2012 7:08 PM 

    SCAM!!!!!
    Glad we did not fall for it. Maleeh where are you now? Wrong again!

  3. Ilham on Thu, 2nd Feb 2012 7:12 PM 

    Bernard Webber is a trickster and con man. The more you see of him, the clearer that conclusion becomes.

  4. Ilyas Ahmed on Thu, 2nd Feb 2012 10:17 PM 

    This was a big time scam! This Bernard Webber is a master con man who had swindled many innocent contestants earlier.

    In fact, one can say that their tactic was to ‘hook’ contestants first without any preconditions but half way through blackmail contestants (in this case Maldives) informing that if they wish to progress further they will have to pay certain exorbitant fees.

    That’s basically how this con was played. It was a good thing that Maldives bailed out!

  5. den on Fri, 3rd Feb 2012 12:13 AM 

    agree with zudha. interesting article by Minivan. As stated it raises suspicion that Matato maleeh was having a secret deal with the new 7 wonders thing as hes the one who actually signed the contract when he was in Maldives Tourism Board and later he was running a website of new 7 wonders even though Maldives officially withdrew this competition.

  6. Ahmed bin Addu bin Suvadheeb on Fri, 3rd Feb 2012 5:54 AM 

    Bernard Webber is obvisouly a student of the Nigerian email scammers. The sort of email that claims that a certain ex-African dictator has suddenly found himself “burdened” with millions of dollars that he would like to share with you.

    Mr Webber took that to another level, by sitting behind a facade of legimitate businesses. It truly is a scam on a global scale. At least the Indonesians had the imagination to carry out a statistical survey of Webber’s outrageous claims.

  7. Ali on Fri, 3rd Feb 2012 5:56 AM 

    Eamonn Fitzgerald is deluded. We do not need scams like this to promote tourism. The world knows who we are. Good for the government withdrawing from this rubbish event

  8. Zudha on Fri, 3rd Feb 2012 9:33 AM 

    His awards are a) expensive. b) meaningless

    They also lie and smear others to protect their fragile position. I can not believe that the international community have not seen this?

    Finally, would anyone really want to do business with someone whom refers to a President in such degrading terms?

  9. Shahid on Fri, 3rd Feb 2012 2:42 PM 

    It seems that New7Wonders received toxic intelligence from MATATO which is why they find themselves in this mess of their own making…. With a little help from the opposition and MATATO!

    I imagine the the Maldivian lawyers will be following up for libel and defamatory.

  10. John on Fri, 3rd Feb 2012 4:31 PM 

    The whole New7Wonders was a scam business model to rip money from governments and businesses. The votes received to each participant was never transparent. Some people try to make money by fooling others. Damnn!!

  11. Ilham on Fri, 3rd Feb 2012 6:30 PM 

    This MATATO idiot Maleeh should be fired. Clearly he is too stupid to run the outfit, otherwise he would not have signed up for an obvious scam in the first place and then carry on promoting it when every one else realised it was a con trick.

    People with pea sized intellect should not run tourism bodies.

  12. tsk tsk on Fri, 3rd Feb 2012 7:10 PM 

    “a major, global-scale proof of a business concept based on mass virtual online dynamics creating concrete economic positive outcomes in the real world” aka – “RIP OFF”

  13. maldian on Fri, 3rd Feb 2012 8:34 PM 

    did u know that this Webber character is married to a Maldivian!! :O

  14. Robin on Fri, 3rd Feb 2012 11:05 PM 

    who damn cares. glade maldives withdrew

  15. Yasir on Fri, 3rd Feb 2012 11:29 PM 

    One good thing that happened to us is that we pulled out of this. I guess they still can’t gallop the fact that they couldn’t rip us off the way they wanted. Maldives do not actuaaly need some stupid new7wonders. We already have good tourism promotion programs in europe.

  16. Mr.Antonio (Spain) on Sat, 4th Feb 2012 2:11 AM 

    Putting the economy of a country in just one basket (all the eggs in one basket) is not a good thing. Spain knows that very well. When there is a crash in the sector, the chicken of the golden eggs faints and the economy gets hurt. Maldives needs urgently to use the huge anount of money they make from tourism to create new business and a source of a different economical added value.

  17. nat on Sat, 4th Feb 2012 7:28 AM 

    is webber really married to a maldivian? maybe to Jameels sister. am i right?

  18. Shahidha on Sat, 4th Feb 2012 7:32 AM 

    What a 100% SCAM.
    Looks like just Indonesia and Korea fell for it then.
    As for Maleeh at MATATO, all your lies that you and your brother spread is going to catch up with you.
    Vote of NO CONFIDENCE for the secretary general?

  19. A tourist on Sat, 4th Feb 2012 12:57 PM 

    Game up Weber!

  20. alien from another galaxy on Sat, 4th Feb 2012 7:06 PM 

    Maldives is the biggest wonder in the world!

    That’s the only country where the Government and the Opposition settle political differences on the streets when there are constitutionally elected representatives!


  • maumoon: The true depth of this Hero guy is very obvious,isnt it.Pray that you do not get sick,for whcih you have to go to India
  • Romeo: Yameen’s approach for economic development is just an imagination probably it will never be realized. This is another trick to dupe Maldivian to fantasize for...
  • Kashim: @Ekaloas, how dare you. Arab culture brings enlightment to Maldives, without it we would still be worshiping statues and idols of Buddha. If you love Maldives...
  • Hamdhan: @Logal Sumaari kaleyge Just because the US military is welcome in Maldives territory doesn’t mean other countries like Pakistan can do the same! Keep in...
  • Logal Sumaari kaleyge: If this is allowed without without the least oppositions, it would set a precedent for others. Next You would see Pakistani, and the Chinese...
  • general: Good ole Uncle Sam is keeping an eye on the SEZs and the Chinese. Uncle Sam knows best, for he sees things that us mortals cannot.
  • Jason: Hero on sun , just get lost with your silly remarks , Gayoom family is only second to Rajapakse family in Sri Lanka , bith are ruining countries , both are...
  • MissIndia NewDelhi: @ Zero aka Hero Maybe your government should provide you with better health and educational facilities. Then you won’t need to travel to...

announcement

Torture victims in the Maldives tell their stories